Search Results

As an academic, I spent much of my time challenging the notion of labels, principally those that led to discrimination or exclusion. However, this was more about resisting ascription, not about the positive imbibement of a label. Now, as an artist, I am really searching for a label that fits.  There are hundreds of options available. When I was young and desperate to become an artist, I was very firmly a realist. The purpose of art seemed very clear to me; it was about representing things faithfully in a naturalistic way. Artists like Van Gogh appeared to me unskilled and even slightly deranged. I left art behind as a young man – for various reasons – and in so doing I was reified in time as a realist.  Coming back to art much later, I realised something deeply important – I was a realist previously because I was wedded to perfection. If I could faithfully reproduce what I was looking at, then I could avoid criticism. No-one could argue with perfection. However, I was never interested in hyper-realism. It always seemed unreal somehow, producing art that is not consistent with the human gaze. In that sense I believe impressionism to be better reflective of how we see the world. Once I returned to art, some key things happened. The first of these was I began to paint. Before, I only used pencils and ink because they were all I could afford. Painting revolutionised how I went about producing art. The second thing, related to the first, was my use of colour. I began to experiment with it. Rather than slavishly trying to replicate the colours I saw; I began to exaggerate and expand certain colours. They were there, but I inverted their prominence. A fleck of yellow or red became the whole. This was a profound departure for me. I began to really see the work of modern and contemporary painters: Van Gogh, Frida and Cezanne in particular. Someone on social media described me as a Fauvist. Certainly, that would account for my radical use of colour, and I do believe that emotion is central to my approach to art. But I do not paint in flat lines and block colours. A semblance of realism remains in my art. I do paint more abstract pictures, but they are occasional and reflective of moments in time, rather than a core feature of my approach. While I greatly admire Matisse and Fauvism, it does not influence me beyond its bold and emotive use of colour. I first described myself as an expressionist. The vivid use of colour and the focus on expressing emotions seemed to fit very well, and it also retains a closer attachment to realism. Further, there exists a branch of expressionism known as emotional expressionism. The emphasis here is on eliciting an emotional response from the viewer. Surely that best represents how I work and what I am trying to achieve when I draw and paint? I thought so initially, but now I am positive that it does not. Why? Because thinking very clearly about my motivations leads me to reject the central tenets of emotional expressionism. Aside from the use of colour, two things drive me to produce art. Firstly, it is about survival. I paint to keep myself alive. It provides me with purpose and drive. I am constantly trying to create works that define reality as I experience it. The colours, as I said before, are always there, they just do not represent fully what I see. Vibrancy and darkness both convey the dimensions of my survival. The other element of my philosophy relates to emotions. To be perfectly honest, I am not painting to elicit emotional responses from an audience. I am expressing how I feel in any given moment. As someone with bipolar disorder, this frequently means outlining either joy or despair. Thus, Joy and despair are fundamental to my art. Although I obviously hope that my work will find an audience, they are not my principal focus. I mostly assume that my work will remain unseen, therefore I do not paint to evoke emotions, merely to convey my own emotional inner world. From this I derive the notion of Emotional Survivalism, which has several key components:   Art is about life. It is genuinely a survival strategy Emotional Survivalism connects to the notion of the Hero's Journey as articulated by Joseph Campbell. It follows the path of Separation, Initiation and Return. The bold use of colour is designed to express emotional extremes. However, the colours suggest themselves in the process. Nothing is planned, it emerges. The emotions conveyed are not about the audience, they are about the artist Realism remains at the heart of the approach. It is not about distorting reality, merely exaggerating certain key elements of it It is broadly, though not entirely, figurative in nature. And in being figurative it is often figurative. At times likeness is imperative and at other times, expression is more crucial than actual representation. The political context is a key component of the artist’s emotional world. More than that, it is a progressive approach to art and life. The process is not precise, it relies on the eye, not on techniques such as grids or sketching outlines. Everything is painted from the first line to the last. Another feature of the process is holism. The imprecision of the approach extends to the notion of lines and outlines. The form blends with the whole, which is in recognition of the connectivity of everything. This also means that the background of a painting always features in the subject. Nothing is ever planned. Paintings emerge in exactly the same way that the colours emerge. It is entirely organic. The immediacy of Emotional Survivalism means that you cannot take months over artworks. The artist moves with the mood, creating constantly, often working on two or more pieces at a time.  Scrap art is important.  Art on recycled art represents the recognition that we are destroying this planet, and the finite nature of all things It also embraces living art - art created on useable items. This again reflects the reality that art is not infinite and that beauty should be ubiquitous Recognition of the debt owed to the great artists is key. Tribute pieces should be in the style not simple replications It isn't strictly necessary to be self-taught, but it is important to find your own way. Learning from others is wonderful, being defined by them is not. In fact, it is vital to convey the world as the artist sees it. Ultimately, the entire purpose of art is to share the artists' reality.   At this stage, this is my philosophy of art. I will refine it as I progress. I hope that it makes sense, and that others might profit from my reflections.

I hate hierarchies. I just do. I'm not against leadership or the need to specialise in certain roles, but my firm belief is that we fetishise hierarchies. For some strange reason we are constantly trying to arrange ourselves in ranking order. I may not be as good, clever or good-looking as that person, but I am certainly better than that one over there. It seems to be a western trait. I guess that is not surprising because we live under capitalism which is completely about class and dividing people up into groups. Furthermore, capitalism has created a system in which competition is seen to be an appropriate way of organising life. Not only do we compete in the sports arena, but we choose to add a red in tooth and claw dimension to other things too. For example, we compete for educational places and jobs and commercial goods and services. This then justifies inequality. You got that job or course because you were the best. Everything is fair and above board. Except that we ALL know it isn't. The deck is stacked from the beginning. People who can afford to send their kids to the best schools and colleges buy them a massive head start. And let's be honest, if it didn't make a difference they wouldn't pay so richly for it. All the discourse about meritocracy is nonsense. Can people escape from the lower echelons of society to attain the best positions and fame and wealth? Of course, but they are MASSIVE exceptions and they are then used to justify the whole corrupt process. And sadly, the same ridiculous notions apply in the art world. People are judged and ordered by the materials they use, the media they use and whether they are trained or untrained. Not only that, but like everything else, people are assessed and ordered according to WHERE they were trained. It really is endless. And that, as far as I'm concerned, is totally nonsensical. The best art and artists have been anti-establishment. They have tried to break down structures and hierarchies. Whole schools have been created to challenge the existing order. Art is subjective. In the end, people like what they like. If you are an elitist and you only like certain oil painters who were trained in specific institutions, but at the end of civilisation you get stuck on a desert island with a bunch of watercolourists from somewhere else, the socially constructed hierarchy will count for nothing. And... It counts for nothing anyway. Do what you do. Enjoy what you enjoy and let the critics take the hindermost.

When it comes to adding a personal touch to your space or finding a unique gift for a special occasion, custom artwork is the perfect solution. Rad Rhymes is an artist specializing in vibrant and colorful paintings, offering a wide selection of artworks across various themes. From breathtaking landscapes to thought-provoking political pieces, his collection is as diverse as it is beautiful. One of the standout features of Radical Rhymes is his commission artwork service. Whether you're looking for a one-of-a-kind piece to capture a cherished memory or wanting to add a pop of color to your home decor, this talented artist can bring your vision to life. Commissioned artwork allows you to have a piece that is truly unique and tailored to your specific preferences. The process of commissioning artwork is simple and personalized. You can work closely with the artist to discuss your ideas, preferred style, and any specific requirements you may have. This collaborative approach ensures that the final piece not only meets but exceeds your expectations. Custom artwork is perfect for a variety of occasions. Whether you're celebrating a milestone event like a wedding or anniversary, looking for a meaningful gift for a loved one, or simply wanting to treat yourself to something special, a commissioned piece from Radical Rhymes is a timeless investment. By choosing custom artwork, you are not only adding a personal touch to your space but also supporting this up and coming artist. You will also fostering creativity within your community. It's a unique way to showcase your individuality and create a lasting impression. To explore the world of commissioned artwork and discover the endless possibilities for personalizing your space, look no further than Radical Rhymes. His dedication to quality, creativity, and customer satisfaction ensures that every piece he creates is a true work of art. So why settle for mass-produced decor when you can have a custom masterpiece that tells your unique story?